The NYT has an interesting editorial on why getting rid of big bills will make it harder for criminals to do business
and make it easier for law enforcement to detect illicit activity.
That's why officials in Europe and elsewhere are proposing to end the
printing of high-denomination bills.
According to a recent paper from
Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government, a stack of 500-euro
notes worth $1 million weighs just five pounds and can be carried in a
small bag.
Whereas a pile of $20 bills worth $1 million would weigh 110 pounds
and would be much more difficult to move around. Lawrence Summers, the
former Treasury secretary and former adviser to President Obama, has
argued that the United States should get rid of the $100 bill.
"The fact
that in certain circles the 500 euro note is known as the "Bin Laden"
confirms the arguments against it," says Sanders. "Technology is
obviating whatever need there may ever have been for high denomination
notes in legal commerce."
Critics who oppose such changes say the big bills make it easier for people to keep their savings in cash, especially in countries with negative interest rates.
Some people also prefer not to conduct transactions electronically
because they fear security breaches. According to Sanders the idea of
removing existing notes is a step too far but a moratorium on printing
new high denomination notes would make the world a better place.
"The
United States stopped distributing $500, $1,000, $5,000 and $10,000 bills in 1969,"
concludes the NYT editorial.
"There are now so many ways to pay for
things, and eliminating big bills should create few problems."
No comments:
Post a Comment