...as in the days of Noah.

"When the Son of Man returns, it will be like it was in Noah's day.

Matthew 24:37


The emergence of the "Nephilim" was what brought about the Flood of Noah.


Genesis 6 indicates that the "sons of God" (B'nai Elohim) took wives of the "daughters of men," which gave birth to the "Nephilim."

What on earth was going on?

The B'nai Elohim is a term that refers to angels.

 It occurs four times in the Old Testament and is rendered "Angels of God" in the ancient Septuagin translation.

The intrusion of certain angels into the human family resulted in unnatural offspring termed Nephilim, which derives from the Hebrew naphal (to fall), or the Fallen Ones.

 (The Greek Septuagint renders this term gigantes, which actually means "earth-born." This is often misunderstood to mean "giants"--which they also happen to have been, incidentally.)

Genetic engineering is not new to humankind. Some believe that it existed during the days of Noah because of the fallen angels bringing the knowledge to humankind.

Here we can see the emergence of such once again arising as in the days of Noah.

The article speaks in glowing terms as if it were a wonderful thing, which it is certainly not!

http://www.liveinthenow.com/article/if-plants-wont-grow-near-wifi-routers-what-are-wifi-routers-doing-to-us

Some of course are concerned about biosafety and recognize the risk involved.

 Scientists plan to reanimate a 30,000-year-old giant virus that has been found preserved in the frozen wastelands of Siberia

Some researchers have suggested that ancient myths may have some basis in fact.

Modern myths:

Myth: Genetic engineering (GE) is not new. It is just the same as speeded-up selective breeding.

FACT: 
 Genetic engineering (GE) and conventional breeding are worlds apart.

 Breeding does not manipulate genes; it involves crossing of selected parents of the same or closely related species.

 In contrast, GE involves extracting selected genes from one organism (e.g. animals, plants, insects, bacteria) and/or viruses, or synthesising copies, and artificially inserting them into another completely different organism (eg. food crops). 

GE usually employs virus genes to smuggle in and promote the inserted genes, and antibiotic resistance genes to act as markers. 

All these inserted genes are present in every cell of the plant.


Myth: Genetic engineering is precise.

FACT:

 The function of only a small proportion of the DNA in a higher organism is known. Modern genetics has shown that genes do not operate in isolation. 

Rather they interact in a complicated way, changing their behaviour in response to influences from other genes. 

Although a gene can be cut out precisely from the DNA of an organism, its insertion into the DNA of another organism is entirely random. 

This results in the disruption of the order of the genes on the chromosome and may result in random and unexpected changes in the functioning of the cells. 

Richard Lewontin, Professor of Genetics at Harvard University, has said of GE: "We have such a miserably poor understanding of how the organism develops from its DNA that I would be surprised if we don't get one rude shock after another."


Myth: GE foods vary from non-GE foods only in the characteristic that has been modified.

FACT:

 The random insertion of foreign genes into the genetic material may cause unexpected changes in the functioning of other genes. 

Existing molecules may be manufactured in incorrect quantities, at the wrong times, or new molecules may be produced. 

GE foods and food products may therefore contain unexpected toxins or allergenic molecules that could harm our health or that of our offspring.

Myth: Genetically engineered food has improved nutritional value.

FACT: 

 No GE food produced to date has been shown to be more nutritious than non-GE food. 

Most GE crops are only designed to be resistant to specific herbicides, to produce their own insecticides or to have an increased shelf life.


Myth: There is no evidence that GE crops are harmful to the environment.

FACT:

 Insects, birds and the wind carry genetically altered pollen and seeds into neighbouring fields and far beyond. Cross-pollination occurs between GE crops and non-GE crops and their wild relatives. 

 In this way resistance to weed killer, for example, might be transmitted to weeds making them more difficult to control. 

There is evidence that crops engineered to produce their own insecticide can kill beneficial insects.


Myth: You can trust the scientists that GE food is good for you and the world.

FACT: 

The money for scientific research on GE here and overseas comes from either the biotechnology companies or the government. 

Both are committed to the promises of biotechnology. 

This means that even when scientists have concerns about the safety or commercial application of the technology, it is often hard for them to risk their careers by being openly critical.

 One respected scientist in the UK who spoke up about his experimental results showing damaging effects of feeding rats on a type of genetically engineered potato was immediately fired from his job.


Myth: There are more important things to worry about than GE foods.

FACT:

 Many scientists don't think so.For example Joseph Rotblat, the British physicist who won a 1995 Nobel Prize says: "My worry is that other advances in science may result in other means of mass destruction, maybe more readily available even than nuclear weapons. Genetic engineering is quite a possible area, because of these dreadful developments that are taking place there."

Some researchers believe that what is being expelled from mysterious jet trails all over the globe (Note:Article has half truths buried with truth and false new age stuff) is a cocktail to genetically engineer humanity's DNA sideways.

Time will tell.

...as in the days of Noah.

There is much to think about when we look at the genetic angle points.

The proponents want us to buy into it.(A must read to gain insight into where we are headed.)

...as in the days of Noah so shall it be in the last days...

***

Note 9-13-2015

So far this post has 85 hits, which for any post on this small blog is a lot.

Apparently this is a topic of interest to some.

Once the cat is out of the bag so to speak, there is no turning back.

 Messing in the realm of God's creation and crossing species boundaries is not a good thing. 

The imbalance and the out of control aspects have the potential of being ultra destructive.

The famines and the plagues spoken about the last days scenario are not to hard to picture in light of what has been in taking place in Genetic engineering labs.

Reanimating ancient biological virus? 

The "What-if " questions need to be asked.

One of the biggest assurances that pro-GMO manufacturers and scientists continue to make is how “safe” genetically engineered crops are. One of their primary arguments behind this assurance is that “new genes introduced in GM food are harmless, since all genes are broken up and rendered inert during digestion.”

Here are five studies disproving that theory…

There are no human clinical trials of genetically engineered foods. The only published human feeding experiment revealed that genetic material inserted into GE soy transfers into the DNA of bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function. Even after we stop eating GE foods, we may still have the GE proteins produced continuously inside us.
 
 How GMO foods damage human DNA

Anyone recall the things that Joshua and friends brought back when they first scouted out the land?

These twelve men went out and walked over the mountains of Canaan and looked at the cities and saw the fields.

In one place, just before they came back to the camp, they cut down a cluster of ripe grapes which was so large that two men carried it between them, hanging from a staff.

 They named the place where they found this bunch of grapes Eshcol, a word which means "a cluster."

They reported that in the sight of the enemy they were as grass hoppers.

The enemy were Nephilim giants who may have genetically altered the grapes to grow large.

***

 Optogenetics, the ability to control neurons using bursts of light, has been one of the most promising breakthroughs in neurology of this decade.

 It's been a boon for researchers, but its invasive nature (the brain must usually be exposed) has held the technology back. Sreekanth Chalasani of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies described a new, noninvasive method of controlling neurons using ultrasound pulses in Nature Communications.

 For the first time ever, he was able to manipulate a genetically modified organism using a new technique called sonogenetics.